Sequential (173) binding

 https://johnkamchihau.blogspot.com/2026/08/httpsjohnchihau.html?m=1

.

Ref: https://johnkamchihau.blogspot.com/2026/09/blog-post.html?m=1

.

.

John : Take a look.  https://johnchihau.blogspot.com/search?q=Wifi&m=1. It's about short-distance Wifi.  You might read them first.

.

Me: Ok.

.

John: Take a look at it. https://johnchihau.blogspot.com/2026/06/blog-post_16.html?m=1 . It said, " RC Network create the phase of an imput.".

.

Me: Ok.

.

John: See the Picture above.  PH = phase.  I use RC network to  split the transmission into 3 route.  

.

Me: Ok.

.

John: Can I say, "T1, T2, T3 are 3 independent transmitters" ?

.

Me: Take a look.  They fit into the condition of 

.

1) Different phases.

.

2) Not a frequency mixer.

.

3) Orthogonal.

.

Me: Why can't I say t1,t2,t3 are 3 independent transmitters ? Yes, I can say that.

.

John: Take a look. 

.

1) In short distance communication,  transmitter is absolutely independent. For example,  WIFI,  Blue Tooth.

.

2) In long distance communication, transmitter can be independent or dependent. For example GPS.

.

Me: In another words,  the longer the distance of transmission, the more dependent the transmission is.

.

John: Yes, I give you guys an example.  I scan the network operator.  I have the following response, 

.

1) Munich Tel (signal weak) <-- independent. 

.

2) Berlin 333 (signal average) <-- independent. 

.

3) Euro Star (signal strong) <-- dependent.